home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- <text id=93TT0197>
- <title>
- Aug. 16, 1993: From The Managing Editor
- </title>
- <history>
- TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1993
- Aug. 16, 1993 Overturning The Reagan Era
- </history>
- <article>
- <source>Time Magazine</source>
- <hdr>
- FROM THE MANAGING EDITOR, Page 4
- </hdr>
- <body>
- <p> Magazines make mistakes, you will not be shocked to learn. When
- we do, of course, it's important to set the record straight.
- But sometimes we feel the need to alert our readers when there
- is only the possibility that a mistake has been made. This is
- one of those times.
- </p>
- <p> In our issue of June 21, we published a cover story on the rise
- of prostitution around the world, particularly in Russia and
- Eastern Europe. As a following piece, we focused on a particularly
- terrible aspect of the problem, child prostitution. Our primary
- exhibit: a set of photographs taken in Moscow by freelance Russian
- photographer Alexey Ostrovskiy. Distributed first by Agence
- France-Presse, they purport to show a pimp named Sasha and two
- 11-year-old boys soliciting tricks near the Bolshoi Theater,
- an infamous pick-up spot. Some of the pictures, which showed
- the boys made up as girls, were too explicit to publish. The
- ones we did publish were awful enough, haunting and unforgettable.
- </p>
- <p> The question is: Were they true?
- </p>
- <p> Not long after our cover story was published we began hearing
- ominous charges that they were not, charges emanating in particular
- from the photo editor of the Reuters bureau there, Richard Ellis.
- Soon the doubts were published as facts: that the boys were
- not prostitutes; that Ostrovskiy had paid the pimp and the boys
- to pose; that TIME had been duped.
- </p>
- <p> Naturally, we had reported on the pictures' background before
- we published them: five independent sources had confirmed to
- our Moscow correspondents that Sasha is a pimp, that young boys
- are part of his "ring," that they work in the Bolshoi Theater
- area and other places. We could not then speak to the boys,
- who were said to be out of Moscow. But later the boy Marik (at
- left in both pictures) confirmed to our Moscow bureau that,
- yes, he did work with Sasha as a prostitute and, yes, some of
- his customers liked him to dress up as a girl. Yes, those were
- the pictures; no, he was not paid to be in them.
- </p>
- <p> But Marik by then had said the opposite to other journalists.
- Why? we asked him. Because, he said, he had been told by Sasha
- not to admit to their illegal behavior. Reasonable enough. Of
- course, it is also reasonable to be skeptical of a source who
- shapes his story to his audience.
- </p>
- <p> Meanwhile, Ellis of Reuters and two colleagues had arranged
- to meet Sasha at the Bolshoi Theater garden to persuade him
- to say the story was false. Suspicious of Ellis' motives, Sasha
- brought a tape recorder in his pocket. On the tape, which Ostrovskiy
- obtained from Sasha and gave to TIME, Ellis and associates are
- plainly heard beseeching Sasha to say the pictures were staged,
- holding out the prospect that if he did so TIME would have to
- pay him "very good money. $20,000." They tell Sasha, "There
- is big money here. You and the kids can get real decent money
- and live in clover the rest of your lives.... Alexey ((the
- photographer)) made his money and in a way set you up." (In
- fact, Ostrovskiy had not been paid for the pictures, pending
- the outcome of our investigation.)
- </p>
- <p> At every turn of the conversation, despite Ellis' attempts alternately
- to frighten and entice him into recanting, Sasha insisted that
- the pictures and the people in them were what they appeared
- to be--as he insists to this day. Of course, it is also reasonable
- to be skeptical of anyone with a tape recorder in his pocket.
- </p>
- <p> Winston Churchill called Russia "a riddle wrapped in a mystery
- inside an enigma." Certainly it seems so in this case. Why would
- someone find it in his interest to insist he is a pimp for young
- boys? Why would Reuters' Ellis--who claimed to be acting in
- the interest of journalism--attempt to induce someone to change
- his story for money? We may never get to the whole truth of
- the matter, but we will continue to try.
- </p>
- <p> James R. Gaines
- </p>
-
- </body>
- </article>
- </text>
-
-